I just watched the latest Bond movie, Skyfall, and true to the latest Bond movies it packed action and the sauve-ness of the character into a slick movie...
But was it worth the franchise? Was it good enough to stand among the pantheon of Bond movies as the movie to celebrate "50 years of Bond"?
Unfortunately...No.
Let me be explain...
I'll start with the things I thought worked.
Music:
The music by Adele was a great throw back to the quintessential Bond themes. Haunting, slow but packing a punch. Adele's voice went a long way to making it work as well. So full marks for that. Madonna's 'Die Another Day' though alright, didn't really capture the essence of what Bond should be...
The Ending:
If you haven't watched the movie yet...look away now! Spolier alert!
Right, so the ending with M's death and the appointment of Ralph Fiennes as the new M, is again a step back to the old Bond recipe. Judi Dench became the first female Bond when Pierce Brosnan took over the tuxedo 7 movies back. She's done a brilliant job manning the male dominated MI6, but you knew she was due to retire from the franchise soon. I mean how long could she go on? So, the change though expected was executed very well.
And of course, Moneypenny!! I was beginning to miss her after they didn't bring back Samantha Bond (Yes, that's her name! You can't make these things up...) after 'Die Another Day'. So, her return, with the unmasking of the full name of the character Eve, is a nice return to the good old Bond we all know and love. Naomi Harris as Moneypenny, is black though, but the early signs point to her being pretty capable of pulling it off...
Exposing Bond:
I quite liked them taking a deeper look into Bond's character, to some extent anyway. Otherwise, he is just a character who you think just grew up in a tuxedo with a license to kill. Does it work? Perhaps. But they really need to do more with it for it to be of any significance. In this movie, it was just a placeholder...
Right...so now onto my gripes...
Story:
Didn't anybody sit and really put some effort into coming up with a creative, interesting, new, original storyline for what is 50 years of cars, guns, chases and women? Ex MI6 agent is disenchanted and feels betrayed and decides to go out on his own and become a super villain and now wants revenge. Sound familiar? Forget other movies, it's very similar to....wait for it....'Golden Eye'! (Just without the Bond girl, villainous Bond girl, Russian satellite, secret satellite station, electro-magnetic-radiation resistant helicopter and dish antennae under a lake in Cuba! But I'll come to that later) Yes the first Brosnan movie from 1995! Why oh why would you copy your own storyline?
'Tomorrow Never Dies' - now that was an original storyline. And yes, the movie wasn't the best, but as far as stories go...it was good. But this was so dour, so yesterday. I felt very disappointed. This is not Bond. So, not Bond!
'Tomorrow Never Dies' - now that was an original storyline. And yes, the movie wasn't the best, but as far as stories go...it was good. But this was so dour, so yesterday. I felt very disappointed. This is not Bond. So, not Bond!
Q and Gadgets:
The new younger Q, I understand. They are looking for a whole new cast apparently based on the ending of this movie, so that's ok. But where on earth are the gadgets? When I go to a Bond movie, I expect to see grappling hook shooting watches, jet packs, shoes with blades, mobile driven cars, mobiles with tazers, invisible cars, glass shattering rings, cars with missiles, exploding pens and what not. and what do I see here? Just a palm print recognising gun that no-one but Bond can fire! And a miniature radio.
Yes, I get that it's a new direction, but it's Bond! You don't have Bond without out-of-this-world ridiculous gadgets! Q actually asks Bond, "Did you expect an exploding pen?"...Yes!! For starters!!
Dialogues:
And finally my biggest complaint. Where's all the witty, funny, pun-filled banter on Bond? Watch the Brosnan movies to see what I mean. It's packed with dialogues that make you smile, laugh and howl. That's what Bond does. Hell, that's what they all do on Bond!
The dialogue here is laboured, slow and so predictable. It's like any other spy caper. It doesn't have enough subtlety about it to be worthy of Bond. And that's not just this movie. It's all of them since Daniel Craig took over. It's not his fault, but still! Give me a good set of lines anyday over a testrosterone packed chase...
I feel sad watching such a great franchise falling into the trap of being comfortable with just churning out movies like a factory without making all the pieces of the puzzle fit in. Yes, it will do well. Yes, it will make money. But when you walk out of the hall, as the adrenaline of watching it starts to fade, you realise that you feel something's missing. You don't feel like the movie was complete. And you're right. It wasn't. It wasn't Bond.
Maybe they just need to hire a director who can deliver all this. Someone who understand that people with power also have a sense of humour. Someone who builds characters. Someone who tells stories. Someone who can pack all this in inside a 2 hour movie. Someone like....Joss Whedon maybe. Avengers has everything that Bond is missing. Great dialogues, heroes whose characters are built during the course of the movie and a storyline that has enough different elements in it to make you walk out feeling.."Yeah....that was worth it..."
Maybe he can give this franchise the shot in the arm it needs.
And while he's at it, maybe he can bring back the martini - shaken, not stirred!